Mathematics of ancient India can be very useful to understand the
motivation behind the development of Mathematics and can help the students
understand how applied Mathematics can be. The interesting questions that can
be asked what is so special about √2. Why did Boudhayana specifically provide
its value? The length of the diagonal of a square is √2 times the side of
the square. Why should I know the diagonal of a square? Squares were used for
geometrical constructions and had applications in designing sacrificial altars.
For example: Boudhayana's
sulbasutra (800 BCE) provides the value of √2
Baudhāyana i.61-2 (elaborated
in Āpastamba Sulbasūtra i.6) gives the length of the diagonal of a square in
terms of its sides, which is equivalent to a formula for the square root of 2:1
samasya dvikaraṇī. pramāṇaṃ tṛtīyena vardhayet
tac caturthenātmacatustriṃśonena saviśeṣaḥ
tac caturthenātmacatustriṃśonena saviśeṣaḥ
samasya problem or puzzle to be solved.
dvikaraṇī.
means “that which produces
2” or diagonal of a square
pramāṇaṃ means proof or first term in a rule of three sum
vardhayet means increase
saviśeṣaḥ one that remains
The
last word is the most important part of the sutra because it tells us that
Boudhayana knew that the result will be an approximation and not the exact
value of √2.
The prescription in sulbasutra can be translated
as:
Thus the above passage from the Sulbasutram gives the approximation:
Where the only numerical computation needed is 1154 = 2[(34) (17) -1] and, moreover, the method shows that the square of this approximation is less than 2 by exactly
Another thing that I observe is how thin were the compartmentalisation
of Mathematics. For example root 2 by Boudhayana uses Geometry. However, value
of √2 can be also found using Brahmagupta's varga-prakrti
(Brahma-sputa-siddhanata). Brahmagupta
(628 CE) uses algebra to find √2 by solving the equation
using “the principle of
composition”4 or bhavana and finding the ratio
for large values of x &
y.
As can be observed the
first positive integer solution for (x, y) is (3, 2) and there are infinitely
many solutions to this problem. Although, Brahmagupta couldn’t give the
solution to all types of this problem. It sowed the seeds for Acharya Jayadeva
and Bhaskara II to design Chakravala process
to get a general solution. Another solution to the above equation is (17, 12)
which corresponds to Boudhayana’s value of 17/12 if we take first 3 terms (1+1/3+1/12). Another solution is (99, 70) or (577,408).
1) Can you figure out how to
obtain 577/408 in the Boudhayana’s value of √2?
2) Can you tell why does x/y gives the approximate value of √2?
3) Why does the approximation improve for larger values of x & y?
It is needless to say that finding √2 is technically a mundane
arithmetic exercise and is not interesting.
Learning this way, we have given an altogether different meaning to √2
and also shown how there can be multiple ways to tackle a same problem in Mathematics.
Conclusion:
This is just one of the many examples where Ancient Indian Mathematics
can be used to motivate higher order thinking among school students and break
the barriers of conditional thinking and such inter-linkages will be very
useful in contemporary times when knowledge is becoming more and more
inter-disciplinary. It is very interesting that the ancient knowledge especially
in India was multi-disciplinary.
References:
2 This last
word is translated by some authors as "The increased length is called savi´e¸a". I follow the
translation of "savi´e¸a" given by B. Datta on pp. 196-202 in The Science of the Sulba,
University of Calcutta, 1932; see also G. Joseph (The Crest of the Peacock, I.B. Taurus, London, 1991) who
translates the word as "a special quantity in excess" and also based
on a presentation by Prof Kannan at International Conference on History and
Development of Mathematics, Jaipur 2013
3 Square roots in the
Sulbasutra – David W Henderson http://www.math.cornell.edu/~dwh/papers/sulba/sulba.html#FOOTNOTE
4 Rationale
of the Chakravala process of Jayadeva and Bhaskara II (Historia Mathematica, Page 168)